The stethoscope diaphragm (D) and you may bell (B) have been divided in to two equal parts and also the first products (branded S

The stethoscope diaphragm (D) and you may bell (B) have been divided in to two equal parts and also the first products (branded S

In order to assess the knowledge and cleaning practices regarding the disinfection of stethoscopes, the healthcare personnel were administered a questionnaire at the same visit while collecting samples from their stethoscopes. 0D and S0B, respectively) were collected using sterile swabs moistened with sterile saline from one half of the stethoscope to document the baseline microbial load on the diaphragm. The stethoscope was then cleaned by alcohol-based disinfectant (Sterillium), commonly used as hand disinfectant in the hospitals. After cleaning and allowing the stethoscope to dry for 30 s, two samples were further collected using sterile swabs (labelled S1D and S1B) from the other half of the stethoscope’s diaphragm and bell. This division of the stethoscope into two parts was done to obviate the effect of physical removal of microbes by the first swab, thereby affecting the assessment of reduction in microbial load after cleaning, if any. In order to eliminate confusion and maintain uniformity, one of the researchers collected the samples from the stethoscopes whereas another researcher cleaned the stethoscope and administered the questionnaire.

This finding is statistically significant with P < 0

Both swabs have been branded to your date and time of range plus the clinical part of functions of the fellow member. The participants was indeed tasked a different identity number. The latest built-up examples were instantaneously transferred into the microbiology lab and were cultured on the Nutrient agar typical and you will incubated for twenty four h in the 37 °C . Identity of your own isolates try done-by Gram spot and basic biochemical assessment (Catalase attempt, Coagulase try, Indole sample, Methyl red test, Voges-Proskauer shot, Citrate decide to try, Oxidase test and Urease decide to try).


Out of 62 participants, 87% believed that the stethoscope is a potential source of carrying infections from one individual to other. Thirty-three individuals (%) had never cleaned their stethoscopes, 15 (24.2%) cleaned their stethoscopes > 8 weeks previously, two (3.2%) cleaned their stethoscopes 5–8 weeks previously, six (9.6%) cleaned their stethoscopes 1–4 weeks previously and only six (9.6%) individuals had cleaned their stethoscopes < 1 week ago. None of the participants cleaned their stethoscopes after seeing each patient. Among the individuals who cleaned their stethoscopes, only one participant cleaned his/her stethoscope daily. Among the individuals who cleaned their stethoscopes, the majority (86.2%, participants) used alcohol-based disinfectant (Sterillium), followed by a plain cloth (10.3%, 3/29 participants) and soap and water (3.5%, 1/29 participants).

Most of the 1st swab examples taken from the newest 62 stethoscopes displayed bacterial increases. The brand new samples taken from thirty five stethoscope bells and you can 31 stethoscope diaphragms demonstrated blended development. Into the stethoscope bells, 96 bacteria have been separated and that comprised of 7 additional genera. Out of the 96 bacteria isolated of stethoscope bells, 80 have been Gram-positive cocci (GPC) and you may sixteen was Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Among the many 96 isolates, twenty-five was in fact possibly pathogenic and rest was indeed epidermis commensals. On stethoscope diaphragm, a total of ninety five bacteria was in fact separated comprising 7 additional genera. From the 96 organisms separated of stethoscope diaphragm, 79 was indeed GPC and you may 13 were GNB. One of the ninety five isolates, twenty-two was basically possibly pathogenic additionally the remaining isolates was in fact surface commensals. Probably pathogenic isolates was basically S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp. and you will K. pneumoniae.

After clean up having an alcohol-depending disinfectant, K. pneumoniae try isolated from one of your stethoscope bells used in an enthusiastic ICU, during the brand new diaphragm of one’s stethoscope used in an enthusiastic ICU, several stresses regarding K. pneumoniae and something Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) were isolated and two challenges out of Cons have been remote in the stethoscopes of medical students.

Out-of 62 stethoscopes, twenty five had possibly pathogenic microbial increases just before cleanup stethoscopes that have alcohol-created disinfectant. However, shortly after washing the stethoscopes, merely a couple of got pathogenic development of isolates. 01.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *